Trilaterals over america pdf

Originally written in , Trilaterals Over Washington quickly became a best-seller and over the course of about two years, sold over 75, copies internationally. The books were very well received for excellent scholarship and original research, and even became a frequently-used textbook in political science classes at many colleges in U.

The co-author, Antony C. Volumes I II. Posted By: Patrick Wood. Sutton in , this is the amazingly documented story of the organization and members of the Trilateral Commission, founded in by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, with the. Pdf koncie uytkownika leszy folder neuroshima data dodania gru neuroshima rpg pliki uytkownika raptor87 przechowywane serwisie chomikuj.

Sutton - Trilaterals Over America Rpg planszwek aktywny dziaacz warszawskiego. Nino rated it really liked it Jul 25, Ziad rated it really liked it Nov 08, K rated it it was amazing Oct 27, Derek rated it liked it May 24, Alaghband rated it it was ok Oct 15, Wyatt Kaldenberg rated it it was amazing Sep 11, Nightocelot rated it did not like it May 05, Tom rated it liked it Jul 11, Rex Mundi rated it really liked it Apr 30, Ray rated it liked it May 14, Rafi Chaprut added it Oct 21, Greg marked it as to-read Jan 31, Jpmontz marked it as to-read Aug 30, Walter Bradley Jr.

Gf Fiori marked it as to-read Jan 27, Jordan Regan marked it as to-read May 28, Carole marked it as to-read Jul 27, Edward Waverley marked it as to-read Aug 07, KnoxnGnome marked it as to-read Aug 15, Aiden marked it as to-read Aug 24, Warnke pre Philip H.

Linowitz pre Richard N. Coleman, Jr. Smith Lloyd N. Jordan Propagandists and Technicians Quite distinct from the political operators, although their functions often overlap, are the propagandists the media and the technicians academicians and research controllers. These groups provide the intellectual linkage between the power holders and the power administrators the operators.

Technicians design the plans needed to promote and imple- ment objectives. They explain ideas to the public and even conceive ideas — within limits. A media source dis- tributing unwelcome news or a researcher developing unwel- come conclusions is politely so informed — and usually takes the hint.

Trilateralist technicians are experts at "getting the message. Strong Robert S. Henry D. Owen Gerard C. Smith C. Fred Bergsten Graham T. Allison, Jr. Philip H. Trezise Bruce K. Abshire William E. Roth, Jr. Gerard C. Vance W. Michael Blumenthal Robert V. Roosa Lane Kirkland John D. Hewitt Hedley Donovan Thomas L. In the 's, of five media commis- sioners, three were relatively insignificant: Doris Anderson, editor of Chatelaine Magazine; Carl Rowan, columnist, and Arthur R.

Taylor, formerly head of the CBS network, dismissed in October The chairman of Field Enterprises, Inc. In any event, Chicago Sun Times is the sixth largest newspaper in the U. According to the U. Labor Party: Donovan played a central role in the "faking of the President, Trilateral disdain for the First Amendment is a factor working strongly against generally sympathetic media attention.

On the other hand, Trilateralist intervention in day-to-day media operation, by use of the traditional tele- phone call, is probable, given the numerous Trilateral corporate directors in the media: Henry B. Davis, a director of Media General, Inc. Their presence is ominous. However, any persistent intervention to kill or re-orient stories will backfire. Most media people are professionals rather than propagandists. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, supposedly a public institution, has always had a heavy Trilateral bias.

This reflects the blurring of public and private which Trilaterals exercise so well for their own advantages. More emphatic is the funding of the PBS heavyweight programs which mold public opinion by Trilateral-oriented and Trilateral-represented firms. Robert C. Pepsi Cola also finances MacNeil Lehrer.

And this government-backed organi- zation is supposed to be a "public" institution. Instead it illustrates how Trilaterals have a flair for quietly influencing public institutions. Taylor s Henry B. Huntington Thomas L. Hughes Richard N. Cooper Elliot L. Roth C. In , 27 out of 77 U. Tri- lateralists were also professional politicians and professional bureaucrats.

It should be emphasized that selection by the Trilateral Commission was long before they became residents of the White House. In the Trilateral backing was more discreet for Bill Clinton because of previous public criticism of the Tri- lateral Commission for its dominant influence. As Governor of Georgia, a state aspiring to be the centre of the New South, he led the state trade missions abroad. While in London in the autumn of he dined with another American visitor, but by no means an innocent, Mr.

David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank. Rockefeller was then establishing, with the help of Professor Zbigniew Brzezinski of Columbia University, an international study group now known as the Tri- lateral Commission, He was looking for American mem- bers outside the usual catchment area of universities, corporation law firms and government, was impressed by the Governor, if only because he had ventured abroad, and invited him to join. Governor Carter, perhaps because he was already eyeing the White House from afar, was only too happy to accept.

The Trilateral Commission is no "inter- national Study group" — it is clearly a group that generates policies and tries to ensure that its own Trilateral Com- missioners have a role in implementing the policies.

The Congress Senators and Congressmen are members of the Trilateral Commission, which, given the negative belittling Trilateral view of the Congress, is somewhat surprising. On the other hand, modern politicians in the "Best Congress that money can Buy" have little trouble accommodating inconsistent policies providing the price is right — for them. Trilateralists also occupy key posts in the House, i.

In sum, Trilaterals have a lock on the legislative process. COHEN were added. This neatly reflects the Democratic majority in the Senate, three Democrats and two Republicans; and it is notable that the Senate majority whip — a key Senate post — is a Trilateralist.

In brief, top administration jobs — Republican and Demo- crat — are filled from a talent pool dominated by the Trilateral Commission. This selective process of filling top Executive Department slots with Trilateralists has been deliberate and ruthless. Trilaterals in the Clinton Administration All Administrations since the Carter Administration have contained an unusually large number of Trilateral members. President Bill Clinton is a "former member in Public service.

Thus the transition process was entirely controlled by Trilaterals. NYE, JR. President Bill Clinton then is an ideal member, unusually so because his entire career has been formed under tutelage and guidance of New World Order advocates. Clinton has a B. Quigley broke the story of an elitist British group financed by the Rothschilds and Cecil Rhodes, whose ambition was to run the world. There is another side to the Quigley story which is little known, and we are aware of it because this author had some correspondence with Quigley about Tragedy and Hope.

Quigley sincerely believed in New World Order but was not aware of the darker side of the globalist types until they refused to reprint his book and destroyed the plates; Quigley was alerting too many honest academics and citizens to the dark side of New World Order.

The difference between Quigley and Clinton is morality. We know that Quigley was an honest academician, a little naive, genuinely puzzled why the Establishment wanted the secrets in Tragedy and Hope kept secret. Clinton, on the other hand, quickly learned the political power profit lessons of the New World Order, in the tradition of Rothschild and Rhodes. Consequently, while Quigley died a puzzled man, Bill Clinton has been supported at every turn of the road until early by the Trilaterals and their fellows to gain a reputation of deceit and devious- ness unequalled by any past President of the United States.

As we write this January Clinton is in trouble. We even hear rumors that he is targeted for political destruction and will be succeeded by another Trilateralist, former Mayor of San Francisco, now Senator Dianne Feinstein.

But make no mistake, the Trilaterals have a firm hold on the Presidency and will continue to bring their influence to bear on its occupant. There is no doubt that David Rockefeller dominates the executive committee, and thus the commission itself. Even if we are generous or naive and see the executive members as equals, then David would surely be primus inter pares.

It is, however, naive to see David Rockefeller as an omnipotent dictator or the Rockefeller family as an all-powerful monarchy.

This is a trap for the unwary. Our world is much more complex. We are looking at a family of families, a collective of power holders with at least several hundred, perhaps several thousand, members, who collectively aim to divert the world, not just the United States, to their own collective objectives. Let's start at the beginning. Leave aside for the time being the U. Labor party theory that Trilateralism uses the Rockefellers as a "cover" for a "British conspiracy.

This portion of the interview follows: MR. Franklin, you were a participant with Mr. Would you provide us with a brief history of how it came into existence? He recommended the establishment of an international com- mission on peace and prosperity which in fact is now the Trilateral Commission.

He didn't receive an enthusiastic response in these meetings and he dropped the idea. He thought, "If the Chase Bank Forums don 't respond favor- ably to my suggestion then it's probably a lousy idea.

Cooperation between these three areas — Japan, the United States and Western Europe — is really falling apart, and I foresee all sorts of disaster for the world if this continues. Isn't there anything to be done about it?

The next eight speakers said that this was a marvelous idea; by all means, somebody get it launched David wasn't quite sure whether these were all his friends. He wasn't quite sure if they were being polite or if they really thought it was a good idea. So he took Zbig Brezinski back on the plane with him.

Zbig thought it was a very good idea and had done some writing on it. Bob Bowie had done some writing on it too. When he got back, David asked me if I would go back to Europe and talk to some people more at leisure and see if they really thought this was a good idea They truly did David and I went to Japan in June of and he talked to a lot of people there. It was decided to go ahead and try to organize and form it There is no reason to doubt that formation came about in any other way — at least we have no evidence that Franklin is hiding anything.

But note that the way the Trilateral Com- mission was founded suggests a loose power coalition, some- times in competition, sometimes in cooperation, rather than a small, tight, iron-fisted conspiracy run by the Rockefellers. But even the establishment Washington Post has found unsettling features about the Trilateral Commission in its current seemingly non-interested packaging. Consequently it is not surprising that Trilateral objectives are not shouted from the rooftops but inferred from policy statements, papers and positions as well as the personal philosophies of those chosen as members of the Commission.

Here's the Washington Post observation: Trilateralists are not three-sided people. They are members of a private, though not secret, international organization put together by the wealthy banker, David Rockefeller, to stimulate the establishment dialogue between Western Europe, Japan and the United States. But here is the unsettling thing about the Trilateral Commission.

The President-elect is a member. So is Vice- President-elect Walter F. Vance, Harold Brown and W. Michael Blumenthal. So is Zbig- niew Brzezinski, who is a former Trilateral director and, Carter's national security adviser, also a bunch of others who will make foreign policy for America in the next four years. It remains the same today, in , a heavily Trilateral membership. So are 22 other mem- bers of the Clinton Cabinet and sub-cabinet Administration. The personal philosophies of Carter appointees are similar to that of Clinton.

Where, for example, President Truman was non-imperialist, these are imperialist Presidents. From speeches and letters written by Trilateralists we know their New World Order position. Carter and Brzezinski obviously could not attend as they were still in the process of reorganizing the White House. They did, however, address personal letters to the meeting, which were reprinted in Trialogue: It gives me special pleasure to send greetings to all of you gathering for the Trilateral Commission meeting in Tokyo.

I have warm memories of our meeting in Tokyo some eighteen months ago, and am sorry I cannot be with you now. My active service on the Commission since its incep- tion in has been a splendid experience for me, and it provided me with excellent opportunities to come to know leaders in our three regions. As I emphasized in my campaign, a strong partner- ship among us is of the greatest importance.

We share economic, political and security concerns that make it logical we should seek ever-increasing cooperation and understanding. And this cooperation is essential not only for our three regions, but in the global search for a more just and equitable world order emphasis added.

It has been the stimulus for intellectual creativity and a source of personal satis- faction. I have formed close ties with new friends and colleagues in all three regions, ties which I value highly and which I am sure will continue.

I remain convinced that, on the larger architectural issues of today, collaboration among our regions is of the utmost necessity. This collaboration must be dedicated to the fashioning of a more just and equitable world order emphasis added. This will require a prolonged process, but I think we can look forward with confidence and take some pride in the contribution which the Com- mission is making.

Zbigniew Brzezinski The key phrase in both letters is "a more just and equitable world order. Yes, according to Brzezinski; and since the present "framework" is inadequate to handle world problems, it must be done away with and supplanted with a world government.

In Brzezinski's Technetronic Era, the "nation state as a fundamental unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force: International banks and multi- national corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.

Why did the U. Why does the U. These questions, and hundreds of others like them, cannot be explained in any other way: the U. Executive Branch and related agencies is not anti-Marxist or anti-Communist — it is, in fact, pro-Marxist. Those ideals which led to the abuses of Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, and Mussolini are now being accepted as necessary inevitabilities by our elected and appointed leaders. This hardly suggests the Great American Dream.

It is very doubtful that Americans would agree with Brzezinski or the Trilateral Commission. It is the American public who is paying the price, suffering the consequences, but not understanding the true nature of the situation.

One of the most important "frameworks" in the world, and especially to Americans, is the United States Constitution. It is this document that outlined the most prosperous nation in the history of the world. Is our sovereignty really "fiction"?

Is the U. Brzezinski further states: The approaching two-hundredth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence could justify the call for a national constitutional convention to re-examine the nation's formal institutional framework. Either or — the two-hundredth anniversary of the Constitu- tion — could serve as a suitable target date culminating a national dialogue on the relevance of existing arrange- ments.

Realism, however, forces us to recognize that the necessary political innovation will not come from direct constitutional reform, desirable as that would be. The needed change is more likely to develop incremen- tally and less overtly. Obviously Brzezinski, and global capitalists have no use for national sovereignty or the Constitution. Their interests are global — and much as they may protest we see no difference between Trilateral globalism and, for example, British and French imperialism of the 19th Century.

Or the Holy Roman Empire for that matter. But this New World Order objective would not pass an elec- torate. Outside the globalists, the New World Order fanatics, we doubt that many in the United States are interested in a planned world economy under the dominance of Wall Street. In conclusion, the Trilateral Commission when pressed makes no secret of its unrepresentative nature nor its New World Order objectives.

Back in in the previously cited radio interview with George Franklin Jr. Donovan is a member of your Commission. In other words, the Trilateral Commission? That is a matter of fact that he has chosen most of his main foreign policy people, I would have to say, from the people he got to know while he was on the Trilateral Commission.

SUTTON: Well, I can only make the statement that this leaves any reasonable man with the impression that the Carter Administration is dominated by the Trilateral Commission with your specific ideas which many people do not agree with. They are not, because they are members of the Commission, controlled in any sense by us. I do think that they do share a common belief that is very important that we work particularly with Europe and Japan or we are all going to be in trouble.

How do you know that it does? I am no man to interpret what the people think about. SUTTON: In other words, you are quite willing to go ahead and establish a Commission which you say does not necessarily reflect the views of the poeple in the United States? It appears to me that you have taken over poli- tical power. Anybody who forms a group for certain purposes obviously tries to achieve these purposes.

We do believe that it is impor- tant that Europe, Japan, and the United States get along together. That much we do believe. We also chose the best people we could get as members of the Commission. Fortunately, nearly all accepted The President was one of them and he happened to have thought that these were very able people indeed, and he asked them to be in his government, it is as simple as that.

If you are going to ask me if I am very unhappy about that, the answer is no. I think that these are good people. The reader can make his or her own interpretation. We hold the view today in that we held in and the date of the radio program — that the Trilateral Commission is not representative of the United States, has clearly by its actions demonstrated that it is a group intent on manipulating power for personal advantage and that these actions or objectives are not those of American citizens — and the Trilateral Commission has no intention of putting the matter to a vote.

Quod etat demonstrandum. The dedicated interest of the Rockefeller family and international bankers in world order, world planning, global problems is the sure indicator that they understand how political control can be translated into dollars and cents.

Trilaterals, one of several elitist organizations for global control, have organized influence peddling companies headed by their own Trilateral buddies. These grease the way more or less legally between government contracts and corporate contracts.

Anti-lobbying laws are so deviously written and so easy to circumnavigate that in practice they do no more than con- vince the public that government contracts are intended to be influence free.

The reality is that the revolving door is significantly con- trolled by Trilaterals and completely controlled by elitists, if we include the influence of such organizations as Council on Foreign Relations long-time Chairman was David Rocke- feller and Yale Skull and Bones with members such as George Bush, Averell Harriman and other government movers and shakers. One well-known conduit for government business using in- sider influence is Kissinger Associates.

Secretary of State. As such, Kissinger was able to acquire and use worldwide contacts and a thorough know- ledge of the contact-contract world. Kissinger uses his influence, earned and gained at US. This is, of course, influence peddling, but apparently legal because the loopholes written into the laws are big enough to drive a truck through and will remain that way until the voting public demands that politics be separated from personal finance.

A more recent influence peddling outfit is the Carlyle Group, subject of a scathing and well-written article in the New Republic October 18, According to this article, the Carlyle Group was founded by David Rubenstein, a minor league former merchant banker, and named after the New York Hotel Carlyle. The Hotel Carlyle is a long-time corporate hangout. We once visited one of the suites and found it to be a dismal, solidly-furnished building used by global wheeler dealers for private business.

Day-to-day operations are conducted by former Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci, a Trilateralist whose entire stock of expertise consists of whom he knows in Governent and how Government wheels mesh together. All are directly or indirectly Trilateral connected. It offers a neat solution for people who don't have a whole lot to sell besides their access, but who don't want to appear to be selling their access.

So the "access capitalist" joins the perennial "Washington lobbyist" — roads to instant wealth for the not-so-fussy lawyer. These losses were used to reduce the tax load of the companies and so everyone gained — except the U. Carlyle, of course, was in the business of matching Alaskan losses to corporate tax avoidance.

Eskimos were flown to Washington, D. According to New Republic, Carlyle has excellent expertise to enable firms to buy Government property cheap — as Car- lucci had spent billions of tax dollars in contracts to large military industrial firms, these same firms were no doubt will- ing to look kindly on his efforts to organize a private auction of assets. According to Carlucci, "everyone in our business is trying to figure out ways to avoid getting into an auction.

Get into auctions, that's a way to lose a lot of money. Trilateral Frank Carlucci, whose efforts are described by Jack Anderson as "the bureaucratic havoc wrought by Frank Carlucci, a human windstorm out of Washington" is a perfect example of the market value of political contact. Carlucci has worked in every administration from Kennedy to Bush, in numerous departments without any momentous contribution to public welfare.

They call and say they'll come and work for free. It's almost embarrassing. Obviously because Carlyle has a reputation for making money, lots of money, at public expense and is apparently untouchable.

Yet one senses a certain uncertainty because the last words to the New Republic writer were "How do I keep it from being a cover story? Therefore, you must hold a key fundamental proposition in mind: Trilaterals are not interested in what monetary system works best, or most equitably, or whether gold is a more effective monetary device than paper, or what monetary system will support a higher standard of living for the world's poor.

The overriding drive for Trilaterals is to manage the world economy, "manage" being a euphemism for control. This con- trol is exercised through so-called coordination of macro- economic policy, in spite of the dismal results from attempted macroeconomic direction. It is argued that the prime deside- ratum for this control device is to keep world peace. Nowhere is there any recognition of the historical fact that such control has always led to conflict: that denying national and ethnic independence is a sure road to strife and bloodshed.

So you will not find rational consideration of alternatives, or the weighing of options in Trilateral dogma. You can, however, expect an irrational drive, come what may, to control the world in the name of globalism and New World Order.

Triangle Paper 14, "Towards a Renovated International System," concludes that the Bretton Woods system has already "come under increasing strain," and events have forced traumatic changes, that is, the periodic assault on the dollar and floating exchange rates. The Trilateral proposal is to involve five to ten leading core countries in establishing the new system. The rest of the world will have to go along as best it can.

Some ideas to this end have already been implemented: for example, a new man- made artificial international money, the Special Drawing Rights SDRs has been created for central banks. As the SDR is introduced, gold will supposedly be phased out of the international reserve system.